Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 F.2d 442 - Bruce v. Helvering

Bruce v. Helvering’s Empirical Analysis

76 F.2d 442 · 1935

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
March 1980
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 1980 · most notably Kennemer v. Commissioner (1938), Starr v. Commissioner (1936)

15 federal appellate · 2 district ·

120193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregory v. Helvering

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(3) Stock for stock on reorganization. No gain or loss shall be recognized if stock or securities in a corporation a party to a reorganization are, in pursuance of the plan of reorganization, exchanged solely for stock or securities in such corporation or in another corporation a party to the reorganization.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.