Roby v. United States Department of the Navy’s Empirical Analysis
76 F.3d 1052 · 1996
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
May 2007
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Seeger · Welsh II v. United States · Witmer v. United States · Molinaro v. New Jersey · Clay v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Analysis 14 A conscientious objector has no constitutional or statutory right to be discharged from active service after voluntary enlistment. Roby v. United States Dep't of the Navy, 76 F.3d 1052 , 1055 (9th Cir.1996); Sanger v. Seamans, 507 F.2d 814 , 817 (9th Cir.1974); DeWalt v. Commanding Officer, 476 F.2d 440 , 442 (5th Cir.1973). Service members' rights to request conscientious objector status derive from military regulations. See Parisi v. Davidson, 405 U.S. 34 , 38 n. 2, 92 S.Ct. 815, 31 L.Ed.2d 17 (1972). The Department of Defense (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alhassan v. Hagee“some proof that is incompatible with the applicant's claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alhassan v. Hagee“whose position is sincere and deeply held,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Alhassan v. Hagee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.