Myers v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
76 F.3d 1330 · 1996
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably United States v. Davis (2001), Johnson v. Champion (2002)
12 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nce a pro se defendant invites or acquiesces in substantial participation by standby counsel, even if he insists that he is not waiving his Faretta rights, he abandons his right to later complain that counsel interfered with his presentation of his defense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Davenport“[w]hether at trial or appeal, a defendant is not required to accept unwanted counsel.... [A] state criminal defendant has a constitutional right to present pro se briefs and motions on appeal. [Fn. omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When considering requests for federal habeas corpus relief, this Court has frequently explained that we review the district court's factual findings for clear error, but review issues of law de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dyer v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.