Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 F.3d 151 - Griman v. Makousky

Griman v. Makousky’s Empirical Analysis

76 F.3d 151 · 1996

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
April 2016
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2016

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

80199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Rascon v. Hardiman · Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. · Allgeier v. United States · Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. · Huff v. Marine Tank Testing Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a party to be `unable' to procure a witness's attendance at trial by subpoena implies that the party used reasonable diligence to get him to attend, and it is up to the district judge, within broad limits, to decide whether, in the circumstances, this condition has been satisfied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.