Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 F.3d 155 - Tuke v. United States

Tuke v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

76 F.3d 155 · 1996

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably United States v. Jackson (2000), Panaras v. Liquid Carbonic Industries Corp. (1996)

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

1801996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · United States v. Locke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the plaintiff must serve the United States in the way Rule 4 requires; actual notice is insufficient”); Despain v. Salt Lake Area Metro Gang Unit, 13 F.3d 1436, 1439 (10th Cir.1994) (stating that actual notice does not constitute good cause); Feingold v. Hankin, 269 F.Supp.2d at 276 (noting that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he Supreme Court insists that federal judges carry out the rules of procedure, whether or not those rules strike the judges as optimal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Failure to read a rule is the antithesis of good cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.