Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 F.3d 194 - United States v. Byrd

United States v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis

76 F.3d 194 · 1996

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
May 2021
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably United States v. Field (1997), United States v. Ceccarani (1996)

28 federal appellate ·

2501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113

Relies on Sisson v. Ruby · Ayrs v. Yanik · Linn v. United States · United States v. Scroggins · United States v. Morrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Entry of a plea of guilty prior to the commencement of trial combined with truthfully admitting the conduct comprising the offense of conviction, and truthfully admitting or not falsely denying any additional relevant conduct for which he is accountable under § 1B1.3 ... will constitute significant evidence of acceptance of responsibility for the purposes of subsection (a). However, this evidence may be outweighed by conduct of the defendant that is inconsistent with such acceptance of responsibility. A defendant who enters a guilty plea is not entitled to an adjustment under this section as a matter of right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Section 3E1.1 [does not] contain[] any restriction against considering unrelated criminal conduct in denying an acceptance of responsibility reduction. Rather, the guideline permits the district court to consider whether defendant has demonstrated "voluntary termination or withdrawal from criminal conduct or associations,” U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, Application Note 1(b), and defendant’s conduct "may ... outweigh” the fact that defendant pleaded guilty to the underlying offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.