Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 F.3d 375

Docket No. 95-7388.

Sneeden v. State Jb

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 16, 1996. Decided Jan. 25, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Sams v. US Department of Housing & Urban Development

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Vester Terry Sneeden, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny the motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sneeden v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-716-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/76/f3d/375 · .json · Public domain