76 F3d 389 United States v. Flading
76 F.3d 389
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Edward FLADING, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-30180.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 5, 1996.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: WRIGHT, FERNANDEZ and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
ORDER OF REMAND
The memorandum disposition filed on December 12, 1995, is vacated in light of Bailey v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 501 (1995).
The cause is remanded to the district court for further consideration in light of the opinion in Bailey. The district judge may set the case down for a new trial if that is indicated, but may dismiss the indictment if a new trial would be improvident.