Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 F.3d 389

Docket No. 94-30180.

United States v. Charles N. Ettien

This page is marked noindex.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-05

Relies on Bailey v. United States · United States v. Banks

Decided 1996-02-05

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: WRIGHT, FERNANDEZ and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER OF REMAND

¶1

The memorandum disposition filed on December 12, 1995, is vacated in light of Bailey v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 501 (1995).

¶2

The cause is remanded to the district court for further consideration in light of the opinion in Bailey. The district judge may set the case down for a new trial if that is indicated, but may dismiss the indictment if a new trial would be improvident.

/76/f3d/389 · .json · Public domain