Yohn v. Love’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

23 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he crucial inquiry is the impact of the error on the minds of the jurors in the total setting. It is thus inappropriate to ask whether there was sufficient evidence to support the result, apart from the phase of the trial affected by the error. The correct in quiry is whether the error had a substantial influence on the verdict despite sufficient evidence to support the result apart from the error.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 383 F. Supp. 2d 720 - Baker v. Horn · 948 F. Supp. 2d 452 - Pagliaccetti v. Kerestes

2. “`Critical stages' are those links in the prosecutorial chain of events in which the potential for incrimination inheres or at which the opportunity for effective defense must be seized or foregone.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. United States v. Rhynes · United States v. Rhynes

3. “A petitioner must show that (1) there is no adequate remedy at law which would afford relief, and (2) there is an extreme necessity for the relief requested to secure order and regularity in judicial proceedings.” (citation omitted)). 3 . See Anderson v. State, Dep't of Highways, 584 P.2d 537, 539 (Alaska 1978). 4 . See 1 Charles Alan Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 193, at 692-94 (2d ed. 1982) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Brueggeman v. Ashman