Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 F.3d 651 - Stults v. Conoco, Inc.

Stults v. Conoco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

76 F.3d 651 · 1996

Citation profile

184
cited by 184 later decisions
6
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 7 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 184 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably McClendon v. City of Columbia (2002), Medina v. Ramsey Steel Co. (2001)

39 federal appellate · 7 district · 10 state decisions

7601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 630 (§ 11 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Little v. Liquid Air Corp. · Stafford v. Oklahoma · Lee v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 184 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[TIhe ADEA 'provides no basis for individual liability for supervisory employees.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The term "employer" means a person engaged in an industry affecting commerce who has twenty or more employees for each working day in each of twenty or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year: Provided, That prior to June 30, 1968, employers having fewer than fifty employees shall not be considered employers. The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States, or a corporation wholly owned by the Government of the United States.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.