Takhar, D.v.m. v. Kessler, M.d.’s Empirical Analysis
76 F.3d 995 · 1996
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2019
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Dodd v. Hood River County · Powderly v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]or purposes of ruling on a motion to dismiss for want of standing, both the trial and reviewing courts must accept as true all material allegations of the complaint, and must construe the complaint in favor of the complaining party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“merely set forth which instances of such illegal use the FDA is likely to view as requiring it to take enforcement action....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.