State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2023
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co. · Thomas v. United States · Baehr v. Lewin · United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip Cimmino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he motion should be granted if the defendant has presented a fail’ and just reason for his request and the State has not relied upon the guilty plea to its substantial prejudice.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pedro · State v. Merino“clearly exceeded the bounds of reason or disregarded rules of principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of a party litigant”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Miller. · State v. Malivao“It is well settled that the terms of a plea agreement, which serve as the inducement for entering a plea, must be fulfilled.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.