Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 ILLAPP3D 818 - Fink v. Roller

Fink v. Roller’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 75 Ill. App. 3d 195 - Huckaby v. Huckaby · 340 Ill. App. 463 - Nelson v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In cases where the putative father has not acknowledged paternity and where the parties have requested a settlement, the court shall review the proposed settlement in light of the allegations made, the probable evidence and the circumstances of the parties. If the court is satisfied the best interests of the child and of the parties will be served by entry of an order incorporating the settlement, and if it is satisfied that the financial security of the child is adequately provided for and that the child and its mother are not likely to become public charges, it may enter an order to that effect. The order may be directed to the defendant, or the mother, or both.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 40, par. 1360.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Except where a settlement order has been entered as provided in Section 9A of this Act, the court shall retain jurisdiction of the cause and may, upon proper prior written notice of the hearing to the parties in interest, make new or supplementary orders for the support, maintenance, education and welfare of the child as from time to time the court deems necessary * * Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 40, par. 1359.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.