Lambert v. Powers’s Empirical Analysis
1921
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2005
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Hogan · Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Markiowicz · Drtina v. Charles Tea Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Time for filing such application does not run from the date of the award ... but from the end of the compensation period fixed by the award.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.