Hinze v. Hinze’s Empirical Analysis
1907
Citation profile
2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2007
2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Black v. Black · Vigus v. O'Bannon · Fawcett v. Fawcett · Donaldson v. Jacobitz · McMahon v. McGraw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The doctrine is well settled that notice imparted by the record will constitute constructive discovery of fraud, save in exceptional cases, where for special reasons the aggrieved person ought not to be bound.... In the present case, a resulting trust is shown, and from the facts which disclose the trust it appears that the fiduciary relations which existed between the husband [who allegedly committed the fraud] and wife [plaintiff] furnish as cogent reasons for holding constructive notice insufficient as in the case of an express trust. The husband was the agent of the wife, and it was his duty to disclose the true state of facts, and no duty was imposed upon the wife to search the records, or to anticipate that her agent had been unfaithful to the confidence reposed in him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.