Mangum v. Stadel’s Empirical Analysis
1907
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1955
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scully v. Porter · Stadel v. Aikins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To charge a purchaser with notice of a [landlord’s] lien actual notice is not necessary. A person cannot be a bona fide purchaser who has brought to his attention facts which should have put him upon inquiry — an inquiry which if pursued with due diligence would have led to a knowledge of the lien. (Scully v. Porter, 57 Kan. 322 , 46 Pac. 313 ; Stadel v. Aikins, 65 Kan. 82 , 68 Pac. 1088 .)” (Mangum v. Stadel, 76 Kan. 764, 765 , 92 Pac. 1093 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shell v. Guthrie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.