Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 MICH 672 - Teft v. Hinchman

Teft v. Hinchman’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1945
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1945

5 state decisions

201889189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The complainants could have proceeded against him the next day, without notice to quit, to obtain possession. He could gain no further right of occupation of the building, except by agreement or by acquiescence in his holding over for so long a time as to indicate a permission to hold another year, or to render him a tenant at will.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.