¶1 OPINION:
¶2 The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the first degree. The jury also found the charge of prior conviction of robbery true. The defendant appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
¶3*537 The decision in this ease is controlled by the decision in State v. O’Neill, ante, p. 526, 248 Pac. 215. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment and order herein are affirmed.
¶4 Affirmed.