State v. Arkle’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1958
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Begerow · Matter of Ford · People v. Morino · State v. Keefe · Newlin v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That it is inconvenient for men to assemble for jury duty, or that the court finds it inexpedient to call a jury, is no excuse for not bringing a defendant to trial within the time prescribed by statute. State v. Brodie, 7 Wash. 442 , 35 Pac. 137 ; Newlin v. People, 221 Ill. 166 , 77 N. E. 529 ; 16 C. J. 447.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Carrillo““The fact that the.defendant is admitted to bail does- not alter the case,””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Carrillo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.