Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 N.C. 268

Rollins v. . Bishop

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1877

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1877-01-05

Aetion to Recover Real Estate--Eviction of Tenant — Practise. Civil ActioN; to recover possession of Real Estate tried at Eall Term, 1875, of Buncombe Superior Court, before Henry, J. The facts in this case are the same as in the preceding case.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1955

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1877-01-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Bynum, J.

¶1 * These four actions are instituted by the same plaintiffs for the same premises and under the same claim of title, as in the case of P. Rollins et al v. Ham Rollins and R. M. Henry, decided at the present term. The same questions are involved and the decision in that' case is referred to as the decision of the Court in these actions. If the defendants or either of them have been evicted on judgments obtained in these actions they are entitled to restitution of possession until the determination of the issue made in them all between the plaintiffs and R. M. Henry who has *269 applied and has the right to be made defendant either with or in the place of the tenants.

¶2 Error.

¶3 Per- Curiam. Venire ele novo.

*

¶4 Rollins v. Edward Sams; Rollins v. Bishop Johnson; Rollins v. James Bishop.

/76/nc/268 · .json · Public domain