Calhoun v. Calhoun’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 60 N.C. App. 145 - Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. Evans · Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc. · Teele v. Kerr · 51 N.C. App. 50 - Helms v. Prikopa · Industrial Distributors, Inc. v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen the facts are admitted or established, the determination of the expiration of the statute of limitations is a matter of law. When the facts are in dispute and there is evidence justifying the inference that the statute of limitations has not run, however, the question whether the cause of action is barred is a mixed question of law and fact which should be decided by the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that his characterization of the transaction as a twelve-month renewable note with unlimited renewable privileges ... was incorrect word usage.... [I]t was not a twelve-month renewable note as a banker or lawyer would say it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“which stated that the memorandum in question was a twelve-month renewable note with unlimited renewable privileges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.