Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 N.C. App. 491 - Colon v. Bailey

76 N.C. App. 491 - Colon v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bernick v. Jurden · Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. Hughes · Robbins v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc. · Cowart v. Honeycutt · Hoots v. Calaway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When [Insurance Company] moved to intervene the action was still pending, ... and since [Insurance Company's] motion shows that it has a substantial interest in the transaction which is the subject of the suit, is so situated that the disposition of the action will impair its ability to protect that interest and its interest is not being adequately represented by [the] plaintiffs, it ha[d] the absolute right to intervene under the terms of Rule 24(a)(2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “released and discharged each other 'from all claims, suits, causes of action and charges' arising out of [the] defendants' lease of [the] plaintiffs' property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.