Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 N.C. App. 93 - Young v. Young

76 N.C. App. 93 - Young v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2018

8 state decisions

201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vassey v. Burch · Brown v. Hodges · Batson v. Bell · Brown v. Hodges · Ballenger v. Burris Industries

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the question of what are the termini or boundaries presents a question of law for the court, while the question of where the boundaries or termini are located on the ground is generally a question of fact for the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.