Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 ND 111 - Re Hvidsten

Re Hvidsten’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 1989
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 1989

7 state decisions

5019481950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chicago Railways Co. v. Commerce Commission Ex Rel. Chicago Motor Coach Co. · In Re Theel Brpthers Rapid Transit Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Explicit is defined * * * as `Not implied merely, or conveyed by implication; distinctly stated; plain in language; clear; not ambiguous; express; unequivocal.'" 33 N.W.2d 615 , 619.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`make and state concisely and explicitly its findings of fact * * *.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““4. Where the statute requires ‘explicit’ findings of fact, the granting of an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity by the Public Service Commission does not give rise to an inference or a presumption that the Commission considered and made favorable findings upon matters, essential to the granting of the application but which are not mentioned in the Commission’s findings of fact. “5. Where the findings of fact of the Public Service Commission omit findings upon matters essential to the granting of a certificate of public convenience and necessity, a decision of the Commission, granting such certificate, is not supported by the findings of fact and under the provisions of Section 28-3219 NDRC 1943 must be reversed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.