Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 ND 194 - Eberlein v. Bratcher

Eberlein v. Bratcher’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
February 1974
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1974

9 state decisions

501948195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Each person * * * who has or claims in the subject matter of a decree or order made by the court a right or interest which is affected by an appeal, must be made a party to the appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Section 30-0211 requires specified citations to be served personally or by publication; a provision which is clearly not applicable to notices of appeal. However, this section further provides that `Service of every other citation required to be made by this title may be made by mailing a copy thereof, postage prepaid, at least fifteen days before the day fixed therein for hearing, to each of the respondents by registered mail. The filing of an affidavit of mailing shall be prima facie proof of service upon the party to whom such citation was mailed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In order to confer jurisdiction upon the appellate court a notice of appeal from County Court to the District Court under the provisions of Chapter 30-26, RCND 1943, must be served upon the necessary parties themselves. Service of the notice upon an attorney of record is insufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.