Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 N.J. 344 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably State v. Gerald (1988), State v. Powell (1980)

36 state decisions

16019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · Davis v. Alaska · United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. · Bandy v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the giving of an instruction that correctly states the law, but is inapplicable to the facts or issues before the court is error, but that prejudice must be shown in order to constitute it reversible error. In cases where as a result of improper undercharging or other circumstances a charge not based on the evidence can only redound to defendant's benefit, harmless error has been found. [ Ibid. (citations omitted).]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[o]ur holding in Christener does not stand for the proposition that reversal is mandated every time a judge charges a jury about a crime for which there may be insufficient evidence to support a conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In Christener, supra, this Court stated that reversible error occurred when a trial court issued a jury instruction on a criminal charge for which there was”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.