Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 N.M. 122 - Lindsay v. Hartog

Lindsay v. Hartog’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sauter v. St. Michael's College · Coca v. Arceo · Coseboom v. Marshall Trust · Mosely v. National Bankers Life Insurance Company · Romero v. Kendricks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Naturally, an innkeeper is not and cannot be an insurer of a guest or patron against personal injuries inflicted by another person on the premises, other than his servants or agents. Nevertheless, the proprietor of a place of business who holds it out to the public for entry for his business purposes, is subject to liability to guests who are upon the premises and who are injured by the harmful acts of third persons if, by the exercise of reasonable care, the proprietor could have discovered that such acts were being done or about to be done, and could have protected against the injury by controlling the conduct of the other patron.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.