Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 N.M. 225 - Michael v. Bauman

Michael v. Bauman’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
February 1992
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently February 1992 · most notably Jelso v. World Balloon Corp. (1981), Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc. (1982)

52 state decisions

1901966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gilbert v. E. B. Law & Son, Inc. · Montell v. Orndorff · Bogle v. Potter · Hugh K. Gale Post No. 2182 Veterans of Foreign Wars v. Norris · Feldhut v. Latham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is true that we have recognized that payment of claims may constitute an admission against interest by the employer or insurer. [Citations omitted.] However, an admission can be rebutted or explained and is by no means conclusive. [Citation omitted.] Thus, the admission is only one factor to be considered together with the other evidence. [Citation omitted and emphasis added.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““6. Assertion of fact must be accompanied by references to the transcript showing a finding or proof of it. Otherwise the court may disregard the fact. “A contention that a verdict, judgment or finding of fact is not supported by substantial evidence will not ordinarily be entertained, unless the party so contending shall have stated in his brief the substance of all evidence bearing upon the proposition, with proper references to the transcript. Such a statement will be taken as complete unless the opposite party shall call attention in like manner to other evidence bearing upon the proposition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is by no means conclusive... . [T]he admission is only one factor to be considered together with the other evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.