Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 N.M. 266 - In Re Southerland

In Re Southerland’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2006

8 state decisions

4019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Respondent also urges that some other courts have refused to follow the recommendation of suspension made by the referees and that we should do likewise. We are cited to the annotation in 96 A.L.R.2d 823, but it is our observation, after a study of the cases cited therein and other cases in addition, that each case must be decided on its own facts; ■and, even though the recommendation of the referees is not controlling upon us, it is entitled to great weight. * * * ” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.