Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 N.M. 591 - Hall v. Budagher

Hall v. Budagher’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
7
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 1994 · most notably 5 Cal. 3d 153 - Vesely v. Sager (1971), Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. Maez (1982)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 38 state decisions

1801966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rappaport v. Nichols · Beck v. Groe · Jardine v. Upper Darby Lodge No. 1973 · State v. Hatfield · Carr v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In considering whether a complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted we assume as true all facts well pleaded.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether legislation in the nature of the so-called dram-shop or civil damage statutes should be included as a part of our liquor control acts is within the province of the legislature and we should not through judicial action establish the equivalent of such legislation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A motion to dismiss a complaint is properly granted only when it appears that under no state of facts provable under the claim could plaintiff recover or be entitled to relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.