State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 89 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably People v. Sesslin (1968), 3 Cal. 3d 226 - In Re King (1970)
2 federal appellate · 89 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1073 · 18 U.S.C. § 3052
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States · Griffin v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . .In the trial of all indictments, informations, complaints and other proceedings against persons charged with the commission of crimes, offenses, and misdemeanors in the courts of this state, the person so charged shall, at his own request but not otherwise, be a competent witness. His failure to testify shall create no presumption against him, but may be the subject of comment or argument. In trials in the district court such comment or argtiment shall be ivithin the discretionary control of the court, and shall entitle the accused to an instruction that the jury shall indulge no presumption against the accused because of his failure to testify.” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Spearman“"... (The validity of the remainder of § 41-12-19, supra, is not before us and we decline to consider its possible continued validity under the doctrine noted in Bradbury & Stamm Const. Co. v. Bureau of Revenue, 70 N.M. 226 , 372 P.2d 808 .) ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Spearman“There's only two people that actually know what happened in the liquor store that night. One of those persons is dead . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.