Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 N.Y. 585

Stanton v. . King

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1879

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1879-01-21

About the 29th January, 1870, the plaintiff brought his action against defendants Loveridge and Harman us B. Duryea, describing them to be… Held: as above the court citing Cochran’s Ex’r v. Ingersoll (66 N. Y., 652); also that, as the order appealed from was granted on the ' return of the defendant’s order to show cause why the ex parte order of the plaintiff, striking out King as a defendant, should not be set aside, why the plaintiff’s amended complaint should not be set…

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1879-01-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1934

16 state decisions

501879188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Folger, J.,

¶1 reads for modification by inserting before the words “ striking out,” the words “ so far as,” and by striking out the word “ dismissed,” and inserting in lieu thereof this phrase, viz.: “ striclcen out;” and by striking out the words “ and from entering” mid inserting in lieu thereof, the words “so as to enter;” and by reducing the amount of costs allowed to twenty dollars, for making motion in Special Term, and for one appeal to General Term. And as modified, order affirmed, without costs to either party against the other in this court.

¶2 . All concur, except Rapallo, who is for reversal of order so far as it stays proceedings in this action, and Andreavs, J., absent at argument.

¶3 Ordered accordingly.

/76/ny/585 · .json · Public domain