76 Ohio App. 3d 87 - Kaufman v. Limobusters, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ameritech, Inc. v. American Information Technologies Corp. · Tandy Corporation v. Malone & Hyde Inc · Wsm, Incorporated v. Tennessee Sales Company, a General Partnership Comprising Bob Beasley and Nathan Davis · 51 Ohio App. 2d 67 - Southern Ohio Bank v. Southern Ohio Savings Ass'n · 63 Ohio App. 3d 100 - Zavakos v. Zavakos Enterprises, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he statute of limitations applicable to analogous actions at law is used to create a `presumption of laches'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.