Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 Ohio Law. Abs. 323

Wright v. Eckle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1957

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1957-02-14

Decided 1957-02-14

¶1OPINION

By THE COURT:

¶2Petitioner requests the court “in conformity with provisions of the Constitution of Ohio and the provisions of the U. S. Federal Statute, Title 28, Section 1915. (D), to appoint counsel to represent petitioner

¶3in this action.”

¶4There is no provision in the Constitution of Ohio or by statute for *324the appointment of counsel for an indigent petitioner in an action in habeas corpus. The Federal Statute which petitioner cites does not control procedure in Ohio courts.

¶5The motion will be denied.

HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN, J, concur.
/76/ohiolawabs/323 · .json · Public domain