Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 OHIOST3D 425 - State v. Gustafson

State v. Gustafson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

220
cited by 220 later decisions
6
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 213 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 220 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Brewer (2009), State v. Martello (2002)

3 federal appellate · 213 state decisions

8201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · Brown v. Ohio · Green v. United States · United States v. Halper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 220 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction, and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “No person shall be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Double Jeopardy Clauses of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution do not preclude criminal prosecution and trial of motorists for driving in violation of R.C. 4511.19 based upon, and subsequent to, the imposition of an administrative license suspension pursuant to R.C. 4511.191.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.