Chupco v. Chapman’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 1985 · most notably Tiger v. Drumright (1923), Salmon v. Johnson (1920)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Miller · Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United States · Woodward v. de Graffenried · Daniel McDougal v. Edmond McKay · Levindale Lead Zinc Mining Company v. Charles Coleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * That no conveyance of any interest of any full-blood Indian heir in such land shall be valid unless approved by the court having jurisdiction of the settlement of the estate of said deceased allottee.***””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““Provided, that no restricted land of living minors shall be sold- or incumbered except by leases authorized by law, by order of the court, or "otherwise.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““It will be noted that section 1 fixes the status of allotted lands as regards the restrictions on alienation during the lifetime of the allottee, and that section 9 fixes the status of allotted lands as regards restrictions after the death of the allottee.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.