Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 P.3d 217 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
7
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably 154 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Hughes (2005), United States v. Maynard (2010)

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 76 state decisions

430200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Patton v. Yount · Rideau v. Louisiana · United States v. Karo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the reviewing court overturns one or more aggravating factors but is satisfied that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence based upon a factor or factors that are upheld, it may uphold the exceptional sentence rather than remanding for resentencing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Suleiman · 154 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Hughes
  2. “although the publicity was at times extensive, and some of it inflammatory, and the great majority of the veniremen had heard of the case, the care taken by the trial court to ensure an impartial panel leads us to conclude that the Court of Appeals correctly found no abuse of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Whitaker · State v. Whitaker
  3. “does not merely augment [a law enforcement officer's] senses, but rather provides a technoiogicai substitute for traditional visual tracking”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Muhammad · State v. Sveum

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.