State v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Albernaz v. United States · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland · 125 Wash. 2d 24 - State v. Russell · 125 Wash. 2d 769 - State v. Calle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he "inflicts bodily injury" means of elevating robbery to that of the first degree does not require proof of an act that is defined as a crime elsewhere in the criminal code, for example, assault, because the infliction of injury need not be intentional to raise the level of robbery to that of the first degree.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tanberg · State v. Tanberg“clear that the shooting of Javon Pitchford was not necessary to accomplish the robbery. It was gratuitous ... one could almost say a cold-blooded afterthought to and not just an adjunct of the robbery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No person shall be ... twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.