Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 116 Wash. 2d 342 - Rozner v. City of Bellevue · Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma · Berger v. Sonneland · 109 Wash. 2d 819 - Everett Concrete Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries · 70 Wash. 2d 331 - In RE DILLENBURG v. Maxwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s currently drafted, there is no provision in Washington statutes for the issuance of a certificate of rehabilitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Masangkay“Because Mr. Smith was convicted of a sex offense, he cannot have his firearm rights restored. RCW 9.41.040(4).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hunter“Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Masangkay
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.