State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Widick v. State · State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City · Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C. · National Diversified Business Services, Inc. v. Corporate Financial Opportunities, Inc. · 12 Kan. App. 2d 594 - In Re As
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q.... You entered the case a month after a trial with a jury where his rights were not terminated. They knew he was in prison, isn't that right? A. Correct. .... Q. And his rights were not terminated and yet a month after that happened, you're treating him like his rights are going to be terminated again based on his incarceration; isn't that right? A. Based on the petition. .... Q. Do you not think a jury's verdict is the final order? A. I would believe so, yes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“should govern in determining the grounds for termination of parental rights when there is a conflict as is the case when a parent is incarcerated for a much longer period than 15 months.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the trial court erred in applying ... § 7006-1.1(A)(15) where termination proceedings are predicated solely on the father's incarceration under... § 7006-1.1(A)(12).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.