Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 S.D. 91 - Potts v. Starr

Potts v. Starr’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2008

21 state decisions

70195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Waller v. Weston · Pueblo De Taos v. Archuleta · Wynne v. . Conrad · Gunvordahl v. Knight · Welch v. McCoy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “which the party might do and might reasonably be expected to do towards vindication or enforcement of his rights.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in case of unreasonable neglect on the part of the plaintiff to * * * proceed in the cause against the defendant or defendants served.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.