Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 SO2D 8 - Sustendal v. Weber

Sustendal v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1960
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on West v. Ray · Dodge v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation · Gibbs v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. · Rome v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America · Trumbaturi v. Katz & Besthoff, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We wish, at the outset, to make it very plain that, in considering the exception of no right or cause of action in this case, the allegations of wellpleaded facts as set forth in plaintiff's petition must be taken as true, for the purpose of disposing of this exception, and not the facts found by the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, in passing upon the merits of the case."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.