76 So. 3d 1132 - Beyer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Toussie v. United States · Rushing v. Jacksonville Electric Authority · 674 So. 2d 738 - Brown v. State · 545 So. 2d 1357 - Perez v. State · 759 So. 2d 728 - State v. Shamy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4)(a) Prosecution on a charge on which the defendant has previously been arrested or served with a summons is commenced by the filing of an indictment, information, or other charging document. (b) A prosecution on a charge on which the defendant has not previously been arrested or served with a summons is commenced when either an indictment or information is filed, provided the capi-as, summons, or other process issued on such indictment or information is executed without unreasonable delay. In determining what is reasonable, inability to locate the defendant after diligent search or the defendant’s absence from the state shall be considered. The failure to execute process on or extradite a defendant in another state who has been charged by information or indictment with a crime in this state shall not constitute an unreasonable delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mora v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.