76 So. 3d 733 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. State · 822 So. 2d 1089 - Graves v. State · Means v. State · 796 So. 2d 1022 - Rogers v. State · 990 So. 2d 828 - Wilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person sentenced by a court of record of the State of Mississippi, including a person currently incarcerated, civilly committed, on parole or probation or subject to sex offender registration for the period of the registration or for the first five (5) years of the registration, whichever is the shorter period, may file a motion to vacate, set aside or correct the judgment or sentence, a motion to request forensic DNA testing of biological evidence, or a motion for an out-of-time appeal ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Wilson contends that he received credit for time served in the county jail to which he was hot entitled; therefore, he was released from custody before he could seek post-conviction relief from the 1994 conviction. [[Image here]] It is clear from the record that Wilson has attempted to challenge his 1994 conviction in an effort to invalidate his life sentence. However, Wilson lacks standing to challenge the 1994 conviction because he is no longer incarcerated or on parole or probation for that conviction. Because Wilson lacks standing to bring his motion, this Court need not address the merits of Wilson’s claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that his guilty plea was involuntary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“were not properly prepared or filed pursuant to the requirements of the Mississippi Uniform Post-Conviction Collateral Relief Act [ (UPCCRA) ],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.