Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 SW3D 148 - Waltmon v. State

Waltmon v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · O'NEAL v. McAninch · Clewis v. State · King v. State · Cain v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible tó prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, provided that upon request by the accused, the prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, or during trial if the court excuses pretrial notice for good cause shown, of the general nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “`relates only to the procedure governing a defendant's request and the State's response to that request, and not to the scope of the information to which the section applies.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.