State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
52 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition · Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition · State v. Sladek · State v. Wynne · Gurley v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence is legally relevant if its probative value outweighs its costs-prejudice, confusion of the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, waste of time or cumulativeness.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“On direct appeal, this Court reviews the trial court 'for prejudice, not mere error, and will reverse only if the error was so prejudicial that it deprived the defendant of a fair trial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.