Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 Tex. Crim. 211

173 S.W 662

Cassanova v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1915

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1915-02-10

<p>Assault to Murder—Statement of Facts—Practice on Appeal.</p> <p>In the absence of a statement of facts, a complaint in the motion for new trial that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence can not be considered on appeal.</p>

Decided 1915-02-10

HARPER, Judge.

¶1 Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

¶2*212 The only ground in the motion for a new trial claims that a new trial Should be granted “because the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence.” As no statement of the evidence heard on the trial accompanies the record before us, we can not review that ground.

¶3 The judgment is affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/76/texcrim/211 · .json · Public domain