Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

76 Tex. Crim. 508

175 S.W 1063

Guyton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1915

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1915-04-21

<p>Burglary—Indeterminate Sentence Law—Statement of Facts.</p> <p>In the absence of a statement of facts and bill of exceptions, there 3a nothing to review on appeal except the sentence of the court, • which is reformed under the indeterminate sentence law.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1982

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1915-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

¶1 This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary, the jury assessing four years confinement as the punishment.

¶2 There is neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions in the record. There is no question raised which can be reviewed in the absence of these. However, the sentence is for four years straight. It should have followed our indeterminate sentence law. It is, therefore, necessary to reform the judgment herein, which is ordered, and as reformed will be affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/76/texcrim/508 · .json · Public domain