Ingle v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The rule referred to provides that ‘three months and no more, shall be allowed for the taking of testimony after the cause is at issue, unless the court or a judge thereof shall, upon special cause shown by either party, enlarge the time.’ The three months are allowed for the taking of testimony by both parties. The limitation applies as much to defendants as to complainants. It is for the court or judge to decide whether further time shall be given or refused, and ordinarily the determination of the question would not be deemed a fit subject for review by this tribunal.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. E. M. Biggs Tie & Store Co. v. Arlington Land Co.

2. ““Three months, and no more, shall he allowed for the talcing of testimony after the cause is at issue, unless the court or a judge thereof shall, upon special cause shown by either party, enlarge the time.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. E. M. Biggs Tie & Store Co. v. Arlington Land Co.