Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 76 U.S. 531 - United States v. Padelford

United States v. Padelford’s Empirical Analysis

76 U.S. 531 · 1869

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
28
cited 28 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 14 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions (28 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2023 · most notably Miller v. Robertson (1924), United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980)

24 federal appellate · 14 district · 18 state decisions

33018691870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of whatever offence against the laws of the United States he had committed . . . and relieved [him] from any penalty which he might have incurred.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Under the proclamation [the pardon] and the act, the government is a trustee, holding the proceeds of the petitioner’s property for his benefit; and having been fully reimbursed for all expenses incurred in that character, loses nothing by the judgment, which simply awards to the petitioner what is his own.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If, in other respects, the petitioner made the proof which, under the act, entitled. him to a decree for the proceeds of his property, the law makes, the proof of pardon a complete substitute for proof that he gave no aid or comfort to the rebellion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.